Prepared by MerrillDirect


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

 

ý QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
   
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2001
   
OR
 
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
   
For the transition period from ______________ to _____________
 
Commission file number 0 – 18032

 

LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

State of Delaware 93–0835214


(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
   
5555 N.E. Moore Court, Hillsboro, Oregon 97124–6421


(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
   
(503) 268-8000

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

 


Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes  ý  No  o    

At June 30, 2001 there were 108,845,343 shares of the Registrant's common stock, $.01 par value, outstanding.



 

LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
 
INDEX
 
PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
     
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)  
     
  Consolidated Statement of Operations - Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2001 and June 30, 2000  
     
  Consolidated Balance Sheet – June 30, 2001 and December 31, 2000  
     
  Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows - Six Months Ended June 30, 2001 and June 30, 2000  
     
  Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements  
     
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations  
     
     
PART II.    OTHER INFORMATION
 
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders  
     
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K  
     
  Signatures  

 

 

 

PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)

    Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended  
   
 
 
    June 30,   June 30,   June 30,   June 30,  
    2001   2000   2001   2000  
   
 
 
 
 
                   
Revenue   $ 74,082   $ 139,878   $ 185,180   $ 265,933  
                   
Costs and expenses:                  
  Cost of products sold   27,771   53,638   69,681   103,223  
  Research and development   18,126   19,406   36,315   37,649  
  Selling, general and administrative   13,366   19,937   30,767   39,451  
  Amortization of intangible assets (1)   21,160   20,707   41,897   41,069  
   
 
 
 
 
                   
  Total costs and expenses   80,423   113,688   178,660   221,392  
   
 
 
 
 
                   
(Loss) Income from operations   (6,341 ) 26,190   6,520   44,541  
                   
Gain on appreciation of foundry investments   --   --   --   149,960  
Other income (expense), net   1,383   (991 ) 4,334   (2,152 )
   
 
 
 
 
                   
(Loss) Income before (benefit) provision for income taxes   (4,958 ) 25,199     10,854     192,349    
                   
(Benefit) Provision for income taxes   (1,281 ) 8,457   3,255   70,786  
   
 
 
 
 
                   
Net (loss) income   $ (3,677 ) $ 16,742   $ 7,599   $ 121,563  
   
 
 
 
 
                   
Basic net (loss) income per share   $ (0.03 ) $ 0.17   $ 0.07   $ 1.24  
   
 
 
 
 
                   
Diluted net (loss) income per share   $ (0.03 ) $ 0.16   $ 0.07   $ 1.08  
   
 
 
 
 
                   
Shares used in per share calculations:                  
                   
Basic   108,623   98,566   108,368   97,974  
   
 
 
 
 
                   
Diluted   108,623   117,494   112,280   117,136  
   
 
 
 
 
                   
                   

(1)  Includes $140 and $168 amortization of deferred stock compensation expense for the three and six month ended June 30, 2001 attributable to Research and Development.

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(In thousands, except share and par value data)

Assets   June 30,   December 31,  
    2001   2000  
   
 
 
Current assets:   (unaudited)      
  Cash and cash equivalents   $ 264,059   $ 235,900  
  Short-term investments   275,196   299,508  
  Accounts receivable, net   19,522   49,688  
  Inventories   67,854   59,493  
  Prepaid expenses and other current assets   30,526   23,249  
  Deferred income taxes   41,523   49,093  
   
 
 
           
  Total current assets   698,680   716,931  
           
Property and equipment, net   67,155   68,554  
Foundry investments, advances and other assets   188,145   189,407  
Intangible assets, net   248,938   286,358  
Deferred income taxes   43,474   34,634  
   
 
 
           
    $ 1,246,392   $ 1,295,884  
   
 
 
           
  Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity          
           
Current liabilities:          
  Accounts payable and accrued expenses   $ 56,041   $ 97,036  
  Deferred income on sales to distributors   33,857   58,184  
  Income taxes payable   5,890   9,484  
   
 
 
           
  Total current liabilities   95,788   164,704  
           
4 ¾% Convertible notes due in 2006   260,000   260,000  
Other long-term liabilities   14,737   15,525  
Commitments and contingencies   --   --  
           
Stockholders’ equity:          
  Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding   --   --  
  Common stock, $.01 par value, 300,000,000 shares authorized, 108,845,343 and 107,533,379 shares issued and outstanding   1,088   1,075  
  Paid-in capital   538,767   522,492  
  Deferred stock compensation   (2,255 ) --  
  Accumulated other comprehensive loss   (49,281 ) (47,861 )
  Retained earnings   387,548   379,949  
   
 
 
           
  Total stockholders’ equity   875,867   855,655  
   
 
 
           
    $ 1,246,392   $ 1,295,884  
   
 
 

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(unaudited)

    Six Months Ended  
   
 
    June 30,   June 30,  
    2001   2000  
   
 
 
Cash flows from operating activities:          
  Net income   $ 7,599   $ 121,563  
  Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:          
  Depreciation and amortization   53,061   51,001  
  Gain on appreciation of foundry investments   --   (149,960 )
  Tax benefit of option exercises   10,056   15,192  
  Changes in assets and liabilities:          
  Accounts receivable   30,166   (52,582 )
  Inventories   (8,361 ) (10,614 )
  Prepaid expenses and other current assets   (7,277 ) 4,606  
  Foundry investments, advances and other assets   (1,874 ) --  
  Intangible assets   936   --  
  Deferred income taxes   (1,270 ) 30,773  
  Accounts payable and accrued expenses   (40,995 ) 677  
  Deferred income   (24,327 ) 22,083  
  Income taxes payable   (3,594 ) 3,877  
  Other liabilities   (788 ) 1,285  
     
 
 
           
  Total adjustments   5,733   (83,662 )
     
 
 
           
  Net cash provided by operating activities   13,332   37,901  
     
 
 
           
Cash flows from investing activities:          
  Proceeds from (Purchase of) short-term investments, net   24,312   (29,169 )
  Intangible assets acquired   (5,475 ) --  
  Capital expenditures   (7,987 ) (16,626 )
     
 
 
           
  Net cash provided (used) by investing activities   10,850   (45,795 )
     
 
 
           
Cash flows from financing activities:          
  Repurchases of common stock, net   (10,614 ) --  
  Net proceeds from issuance of common stock   14,591   18,166  
     
 
 
             
  Net cash provided by financing activities   3,977   18,166  
     
 
 
           
           
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents   28,159   10,272  
           
Beginning cash and cash equivalents   235,900   113,824  
   
 
 
           
Ending cash and cash equivalents   $ 264,059   $ 124,096  
   
 
 
           
           
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:          
  Cash paid for income taxes   $ 12,566   $ 16,194  
  Cash paid for interest   6,175   6,161  
Supplemental disclosures of non-cash investing and financing activities:          
  Unrealized loss on appreciation of foundry investments included in other comprehensive income   $ (1,420 ) $ (3,455 )

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

Note 1 - Basis of Presentation:

The accompanying consolidated financial statements are unaudited and have been prepared by the Company pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and in our opinion include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for the fair statement of results for the interim periods. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements and notes thereto included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires us  to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the fiscal periods presented. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

We report based on a 52 or 53 week year ending on the Saturday closest to December 31. For ease of presentation, we have adopted the convention of using March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31 as period end dates for all financial statement captions.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of the factors set forth in the section entitled “Factors Affecting Future Results” and elsewhere in the report.

Note 2 - Revenue Recognition:

Revenue from sales to OEM customers is recognized upon shipment provided that persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the price is fixed, title has transferred, collection of resulting receivables is probable, there are no customer acceptance requirements and no remaining significant obligations.  Certain of our sales are made to distributors under agreements providing price protection and right of return on unsold merchandise.  Revenue and cost relating to such distributor sales are deferred until the product is sold by the distributor and related revenue and costs are then reflected in income.

Note 3 – Net Income Per Share

Net income per share is computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially dilutive securities assumed to be outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method. Potentially dilutive securities consist of stock options, warrants to purchase common stock and convertible subordinated notes.

The most significant difference between basic and diluted net income per share is that basic net income per share does not treat potentially dilutive securities such as stock options, warrants and convertible notes as outstanding. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2000, diluted weighted-average shares outstanding include the effect of stock options and warrants and approximately 12.5 million shares issuable on the assumed conversion of our $260 million of convertible subordinated notes. Additionally, diluted net income per share is adjusted to exclude interest expense and debt issuance cost amortization (net of tax) of approximately $2.4 million and $4.8 million, respectively. Diluted net income per common share for the first six months of 2001 is based only on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period and options and warrants, as the inclusion of the convertible subordinated notes would be antidilutive. For the June 2001 quarter, the computation of net loss per share excludes the effect of stock options, warrants and the convertible notes as their inclusion would be antidilutive. A reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of basic and diluted net income per share is presented below (in thousands, except for per share data):

    Three months ended   Six months ended  
   
 
 
    June 30,   June 30,   June 30,   June 30,  
    2001   2000   2001   2000  
   
 
 
 
 
                   
Net (loss) income   $ (3,677 ) $ 16,742   $ 7,599   $ 121,563  
   
 
 
 
 
                   
Shares used in basic net (loss) income per share calculations   108,623   98,566   108,368   97,974  
                   
Dilutive effect of stock options,  warrants and convertible subordinated notes for periods in 2000 and stock options and warrants for the six months ended June 30, 2001     18,928   3,912   19,162  
   
 
 
 
 
Shares used in diluted net (loss) income per share   108,623   117,494   112,280   117,136  
   
 
 
 
 
Basic net (loss) income per share   $ (0.03 ) $ 0.17   $ .07   $ 1.24  
   
 
 
 
 
Diluted net (loss) income per share   $ (0.03 ) $ 0.16   $ .07   $ 1.08  
   
 
 
 
 

On August 31, 2000 our Board of Directors approved a two-for-one stock split of our common stock to be effected in the form of a stock dividend of one share of common stock for each share of our outstanding common stock. This dividend was paid on October 11, 2000 to shareholders of record on September 20, 2000.  All share and per share amounts presented in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes thereto have been adjusted retroactively to reflect this two-for-one split.

In July 2000, we completed a follow-on public stock offering, consisting of 8,000,000 shares of our common stock at a price of $27.44 per share. Our net proceeds were approximately $210 million after deducting underwriting discounts and offering expenses.

Note 4 - Inventories (in thousands):

  June 30,   Dec. 31,  
  2001   2000  
 
 
 
Work in progress $ 43,965   $ 37,718  
Finished goods 23,889   21,775  
 
 
 
  $ 67,854   $ 59,493  
 
 
 

 

Note 5 - Changes in Stockholders' Equity (in thousands):
 
  Common
Stock
  Paid-in
Capital
  Deferred
Stock
Compensation
  Unrealized
 loss
 on appreciation
 of Foundry
 Investments
  Retained
Earnings
  Total  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balances, Dec. 31, 2000 $ 1,075   $ 522,492   $   $ (47,861 ) $ 379,949   $ 855,655  
                         
Common stock issued 19   14,320         14,339  
                         
Repurchase of common stock (6 ) (10,608 )     —       (10,614 )
                         
Tax benefit of option exercises   10,056         10,056  
                         
Unrealized loss on foundry investments (Note 8)       (1,420 )   (1,420 )
                         
Deferred stock compensation   2,423   (2,423 )      
                         
Amortization of deferred stock compensation     168       168  
                         
Other   84         84  
                         
Net income for the six-month period         7,599   7,599  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balances, June 30, 2001 $ 1,088   $ 538,767   $ (2,255 ) $ (49,281 ) $ 387,548   $ 875,867  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Total comprehensive income for the first six-month period of 2001 was approximately $6.2 million and is comprised of net income of $7.6 million and unrealized loss on market depreciation of foundry investments of $1.4 million, net of tax.

Note 6 - New Accounting Pronouncements:

In June 1998, the FASB issued SFAS 133, "Accounting for Derivatives Instruments and Hedging Activities." SFAS 133 establishes new accounting treatment for derivatives and hedging activities and supersedes and amends a number of existing accounting standards.  We adopted this pronouncement in the first quarter of 2001; such adoption did not and has not had a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

In July 2001, the FASB issued SFAS 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”, which supersedes APB Opinion No. 17, “Intangible Assets”. SFAS 142, among other things, establishes new standards for intangible assets acquired in a business combination,  eliminates amortization of goodwill and sets forth requirements to periodically evaluate goodwill for impairment. We expect to adopt this statement during the first quarter of 2002. For the first six months of 2001, we recorded goodwill and intangible asset amortization expense totaling approximately $41.9 million.

Note 7 - Legal Matters:

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. V. ALTERA CORPORATION (CASE NO. C-94-20567-RMW, N.D. CAL.).

In connection with our 1999 acquisition of Vantis, we agreed to assume both the claims against Altera and the claims by Altera against AMD in the case captioned Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. V. Altera Corporation (Case No. C-94-20567-RMW) proceeding in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. This litigation, which began in 1994, involved multiple claims and counterclaims for patent infringement relating to Vantis and Altera programmable logic devices and both parties were seeking damages and injunctive relief.

On May 31, 2000, Altera Corporation filed a complaint against us in U.S. District Court in the Northern District of California, alleging infringement of certain Altera patents by unspecified Lattice products. On June 22, 2000, we answered Altera's complaint denying any infringement by Lattice, and simultaneously brought a series of counterclaims alleging infringement by Altera of certain Lattice patents.

On July 23, 2001, we and Altera announced a comprehensive, royalty-free patent cross-license agreement and a multi-year patent peace agreement. In addition, we and Altera each agreed to dismiss all patent infringement suits against each other without any admission of liability. However, no payments were exchanged as part of the settlement.

Note 8 – Gain on Appreciation of Foundry Investments:

In 1995, we entered into a series of agreements with United Microelectronics Corporation ("UMC"), a public Taiwanese company, pursuant to which we agreed to join UMC and several other companies to form a separate Taiwanese corporation, ("UICC"), for the purpose of building and operating an advanced semiconductor manufacturing facility in Taiwan, Republic of China.  Under the terms of the agreements, we invested approximately $49.7 million for an approximate 10% equity interest in the corporation and the right to receive a percentage of the facility's wafer production at market prices.

In 1996, we entered into an agreement with Utek Corporation, a public Taiwanese company in the wafer foundry business that became affiliated with the UMC group in 1998, pursuant to which we agreed to make a series of equity investments in Utek under specific terms. In exchange for these investments, we received the right to purchase a percentage of Utek's wafer production. Under this agreement, we invested approximately $17.5 million.

On January 3, 2000, UICC and Utek merged into UMC . As a result, during the first quarter of 2000, we recognized a $150.0 million gain ($92.1 million after-tax) in income representing the appreciation of our foundry investment in UICC and Utek. We currently own approximately 84 million shares of UMC common stock. We will retain the right to purchase a certain percentage of UMC’s wafer production as discussed above as long as we retain a certain percentage of these shares. Also, due to regulatory restrictions, approximately one-third of our shares may not be sold until after January 2002, with the regulatory restrictions expiring between January 2002 and January 2004. As the regulatory restrictions expire and if we liquidate our UMC shares, it is likely that the amount of any future realized gain will be different from the accounting gain reported.

In addition to the gain described above, we have reported the following unrealized gains and losses to account for changes in the market value of our unrestricted shares of UMC. During the first quarter of 2000, we recorded an approximate $7.6 million unrealized gain ($4.7 million net of tax). Unrealized losses recorded during the remainder of 2000 were $85.4 million ($52.6 million net of tax). For the six months ended June 30, 2001, we recorded a $2.3 million unrealized loss ($1.4 million net of tax). The net unrealized loss, totaling $49.3 million after tax, is included as Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss in our Consolidated Balance Sheet (see Note 5).

Note 9 – Segment and Geographic Information:

We operate in one industry segment comprising the design, development, manufacture and marketing of high performance programmable logic devices. Our sales by major geographic area were as follows (in thousands):

  Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended  
 
 
 
  June 30,   June 30,   June 30,   June 30,  
  2001   2000   2001   2000  
 
 
 
 
 
United States $ 35,112   $ 61,421   $ 88,366   $ 114,783  
Export sales:                
  France 1,381   17,015   3,924   29,955  
  Other Europe 18,920   24,484   43,736   49,381  
  Asia 14,729   25,967   38,590   49,964  
  Other 3,940   10,991   10,564   21,850  
   
 
 
 
 
  38,970   78,457   96,814   151,150  
 
 
 
 
 
  $ 74,082   $ 139,878   $ 185,180   $ 265,933  
 
 
 
 
 

Resale of product through two distributors accounted for approximately 30% and 21% of revenue in the first six months of 2001, and 23% and 19%, respectively, for the first six months of 2000. Revenue from one customer, a contract manufacturer, accounted for approximately 12% of total revenues for the first six months of 2000. More than 90% of our property and equipment is located in the United States. Other long-lived assets located outside the United States consist primarily of foundry investments and advances (see Note 8).

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION

Results of Operations

Key elements of our consolidated statement of operations, expressed as a percentage of revenues, were as follows:

  Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended  
 
 
 
  June 30, 2001   June 30, 2000   June 30, 2001   June 30, 2000  
 
 
 
 
 
                 
Revenue 100.0%   100.0%   100.0%   100.0%  
Gross margin 62.5%   61.7%   62.4%   61.2%  
Research and development expenses 24.5%   13.9%   19.6%   14.2%  
Selling, general and administrative expenses 18.0%   14.3%   16.6%   14.8%  
(Loss) income from operations (8.6%)   18.7%   3.5%   16.7%  

Revenue:

Revenue for the second quarter and first six months of 2001 decreased $65.8 and $80.8 million, or 47% and 30%, as compared to the same calendar periods of 2000, respectively. This revenue decrease is attributable to decreased end customer demand for our products, including our high density products. Revenue declined across all geographies and the communications end market was particularly weak. The semiconductor and PLD markets are currently in the midst of a significant downturn.

In July 2001, we announced that we expected another significant sequential decline in quarterly revenue during the third quarter of 2001. We believe that this is the result of a continued general decline in PLD consumption, particularly in the communications end market. The extent of this decline and whether this decline will extend beyond the third quarter of 2001 is not known at this time.

For the first six months of 2001, revenue from the sale of high density products decreased $53.6 million, or 27 percent, as compared to the first six months of 2000, and now comprises 77% of total revenue.

As a percentage of total revenue, export sales to Asia increased during the first six months of 2001 when compared to the first six months of 2000, rising to 21% from 19%. U.S. sales increased to 48% for the first six months of 2001 as compared to 43% for the first six months of 2000, while export sales to Europe decreased to 26% from 30% for the same period.

Overall average selling prices generally increased in the second quarter and first six months of 2001 as compared to the same calendar period of 2000. Fluctuations in overall average selling prices were due primarily to product mix changes.  Although selling prices of mature products generally decline over time, this decline is at times offset by higher selling prices of new products.  Our ability to achieve revenue growth is in large part dependent on the continued development, introduction and market acceptance of new products.

Gross margin:

Gross margin as a percentage of revenue was 62.5% and 62.4% in the second quarter and first six months of 2001, as compared to 61.7% and 61.2% in the same calendar periods of 2000, respectively. This gross margin improvement is primarily due to continued reductions in our manufacturing costs and improvements in our product mix. Reductions in manufacturing costs resulted primarily from yield improvements, migration of products to more advanced technologies and smaller die sizes, and wafer, assembly and test price reductions.

Research and development:

Research and development ("R&D") expenses decreased approximately $1.3 million during both the second quarter of 2001 and first six months of 2001 when compared to the same calendar periods of 2000. These decreases are primarily attributable to reductions in discretionary spending.  Spending remained focused on the development of new products. We believe that a continued commitment to research and development is essential in order to maintain product leadership of our existing product families and to provide innovative new product offerings, and therefore we expect to continue to make significant future investments in research and development.

Selling, General and Administrative Expense:

Selling, general and administrative ("SG&A") expenses decreased approximately $6.6 million and $8.7 million in the second quarter and first six months of 2001 when compared to the same calendar periods of 2000, respectively.  These decreases were primarily due to lower variable costs associated with reduced revenue and profitability and reductions in discretionary spending.

Amortization of Intangible Assets:

Amortization of intangible assets was approximately $21.2 million and $41.9 million in the second quarter and first six months of 2001, increasing slightly when compared to $20.7 million and $41.1 million for the same calendar periods of 2000, respectively.  The estimated weighted average useful life of the intangible assets for current technology, assembled workforce, customer lists, trademarks, patents and residual goodwill is approximately five years.

In July 2001, the FASB issued SFAS 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”, which supersedes APB Opinion No. 17, “Intangible Assets”. SFAS 142, among other things, establishes new standards for intangible assets acquired in a business combination,  eliminates amortization of goodwill and sets forth requirements to periodically evaluate goodwill for impairment. We expect to adopt this statement during the first quarter of 2002.

Gain on appreciation of foundry investments:

The gain on appreciation of foundry investments in the first quarter of 2000 was recorded on January 3, 2000 and represents appreciation of our UMC common shares (see Note 8).

Other income (expense), net:

Other income (expense), net increased by approximately $2.4 million and $6.5 million in the second quarter and first six months of 2001 as compared to the same calendar periods of 2000, respectively. These increases are due primarily to increased investment income from cash generated from our follow-on public stock offering completed in July 2000 (see Note 3), which more than offset lower interest rates on invested balances.

Provision for income taxes:

The (benefit) provision for income taxes for the second quarter and first six months of 2001 results in an effective tax rate of (25.8%) and 30.0% of pretax (loss) income, as compared to 33.6% and 36.8% of pretax income for the same calendar periods of 2000, respectively. The tax benefit in the second quarter of 2001 is the result of pretax loss reported in the period. The tax rates associated with the tax benefit in the second quarter of 2001 and the provision for income taxes for the first half of 2001 are lower than the rates in the comparable periods of 2000 because of the taxable loss in the second quarter of 2001 and the proportionate amount of non taxable investment income to taxable income or loss. The tax rate in the 2000 periods was also adversely affected by the application of our marginal tax rate in the first quarter of 2000 on the unrealized gain on appreciation of foundry investments. The effective rate for all periods presented is lower than the combined federal and state statutory rates primarily because of tax-exempt investment income and tax credits.

FACTORS AFFECTING FUTURE RESULTS

Risks Related to Our Business

The cyclical nature of the semiconductor industry may limit our ability to maintain or increase revenue and profit levels during industry downturns.

The semiconductor industry is highly cyclical, to a greater extent than other less dynamic or less technology-driven industries.  Our financial performance has periodically been negatively affected by past downturns in the semiconductor industry. Factors that have contributed to these downturns include:

  · the cyclical nature of the demand for the products of semiconductor customers;
  · general reductions in inventory levels by customers;
  · excess production capacity; and
  · accelerated declines in average selling prices.

When these or other conditions in the semiconductor industry occur in future periods, there is likely to be an adverse effect on our operating results.

Currently, the industry is undergoing a significant and extended downturn, which has negatively impacted our operating results in the first six months of 2001. We believe the current downturn to be cyclical in nature and have initiated management actions consistent with this view. Although we are currently operating at a loss, we believe continued aggressive investment in new product development is essential and will ensure that we are in the best position to participate in a future cyclical rebound in our market. Should the current downturn extend further we may take additional actions to improve our profitability or our cash flow. If these additional actions become necessary, there is likely to be an adverse effect on our operating results.

A downturn in the communications equipment or computing end markets will cause a reduction in demand for our products and limit our ability to maintain or increase our revenue and profit levels.

A significant  portion of our revenue is derived from customers in the communications equipment and computing end markets. Due to a deterioration in general economic conditions and a significant reduction in information technology capital spending, these end markets have declined  in 2001 when compared to prior years. In addition, an abrupt transition from an environment of rapid growth to the current environment in these end equipment markets has resulted in an excess of component inventory within our end customers.

At present and in the future when these or other similar conditions exist, there is likely to be an adverse effect on our operating results.

We may be unsuccessful in defining, developing or selling new products required to maintain or expand our business.

As a semiconductor company, we operate in a dynamic environment marked by rapid product obsolescence. Our future success depends on our ability to introduce new or improved products that meet customer needs while achieving acceptable margins. If we fail to introduce these new products in a timely manner or these products fail to achieve market acceptance, our operating results would be harmed.

The introduction of new products in a dynamic market environment presents significant business challenges. Product development commitments and expenditures must be made well in advance of product sales. The success of a new product depends on accurate forecasts of long-term market demand and future technology developments. Our future revenue growth is dependent on market acceptance of our new product families and the continued market acceptance of our software development tools. The success of these products is dependent on a variety of specific technical factors including:

  · successful product definition;
  · timely and efficient completion of product design;
  · timely and efficient implementation of wafer manufacturing and assembly processes;
  · product performance; and
  · the quality and reliability of the product.

If, due to these or other factors, our new products do not achieve market acceptance, our operating results would be harmed.

Our products may not be competitive if we are unsuccessful in migrating our manufacturing processes to more advanced technologies or alternative fabrication facilities.

To develop new products and maintain the competitiveness of existing products, we need to migrate to more advanced wafer manufacturing processes that use larger wafer sizes and smaller device geometries. We also may need to use additional foundries. Because we depend upon foundries to provide their facilities and support for our process technology development, we may experience delays in the availability of advanced wafer manufacturing process technologies at existing or new wafer fabrication facilities. As a result, volume production of our advanced process technologies at the new fabs of Seiko Epson, UMC or future foundries may not be achieved. This could harm our operating results.

Recently, UMC informed us that as part of an overall capacity rationalization they are planning to close certain of their fabrication facilities. We are currently developing an advanced wafer manufacturing process at one of the UMC fabs that will be closed. With UMC’s support, we are planning to transfer this process to an alternative UMC fab. However, transfer of a manufacturing process is a technically demanding and time intensive challenge. As a result, our new product introduction schedules may be delayed. This could harm our operating results.

Our future quarterly operating results may fluctuate and therefore may fail to meet expectations.

Our quarterly operating results have fluctuated and may continue to fluctuate. Consequently, our operating results may fail to meet the expectations of analysts and investors. As a result of industry conditions and the following specific factors, our quarterly operating results are more likely to fluctuate and are more difficult to predict than a typical non-technology company of our size and maturity:

  · general economic conditions in the countries where we sell our products;
  · conditions within the end markets into which we sell our products;
  · the cyclical nature of demand for our customers' products;
  · excessive inventory accumulation by our end customers;
  · the timing of our and our competitors' new product introductions;
  · product obsolescence;
  · the scheduling, rescheduling and cancellation of large orders by our customers;
  · our ability to develop new process technologies and achieve volume production at the new fabs of Seiko Epson, UMC  or at other foundries;
  · changes in manufacturing yields;
  · adverse movements in exchange rates, interest rates or tax rates; and
  · the availability of adequate supply commitments from our wafer foundries and assembly and test subcontractors

As a result of these factors, our past financial results are not necessarily a good predictor of our future results.

Our stock price may continue to experience large short-term fluctuations.

In recent years, the price of our common stock has fluctuated greatly. These price fluctuations have been rapid and severe and have left investors little time to react. The price of our common stock may continue to fluctuate greatly in the future due to a variety of company specific factors, including:

  · quarter-to-quarter variations in our operating results;
  · shortfalls in revenue or earnings from levels expected by securities analysts; and
  · announcements of technological innovations or new products by other companies.

Our wafer supply may be interrupted or reduced, which may result in a shortage of finished products available for sale.

We do not manufacture finished silicon wafers. Currently, all of our silicon wafers are manufactured by Seiko Epson in Japan, AMD in the United States and UMC in Taiwan. If Seiko Epson, through its U.S. affiliate Epson Electronics America, AMD or UMC significantly interrupts or reduces our wafer supply, our operating results could be harmed.

In the past, we have experienced delays in obtaining wafers and in securing supply commitments from our foundries. At present, we anticipate that our supply commitments are adequate. However, these existing supply commitments may not be sufficient for us to satisfy customer demand in future periods. Additionally, notwithstanding our supply commitments we may still have difficulty in obtaining wafer deliveries consistent with the supply commitments. We negotiate wafer prices and supply commitments from our suppliers on at least an annual basis. If any of Seiko Epson, Epson Electronics America, AMD or UMC were to reduce its supply commitment or increase its wafer prices, and we cannot find alternative sources of wafer supply, our operating results could be harmed.

Many other factors that could disrupt our wafer supply are beyond our control.  Since worldwide manufacturing capacity for silicon wafers is limited and inelastic, we could be harmed by significant industry-wide increases in overall wafer demand or interruptions in wafer supply. Additionally, a future disruption of Seiko Epson's, AMD's or UMC's foundry operations as a result of a fire, earthquake or other natural disaster could disrupt our wafer supply and could harm our operating results.

If our foundry partners experience quality or yield problems, we may face a shortage of finished products available for sale.

We depend on our foundries to deliver reliable silicon wafers with acceptable yields in a timely manner. As is common in our industry, we have experienced wafer yield problems and delivery delays. If our foundries are unable to produce silicon wafers that meet our specifications, with acceptable yields, for a prolonged period, our operating results could be harmed.

Substantially all of our revenue is derived from products based on a specialized silicon wafer manufacturing process technology called E²CMOS. The reliable manufacture of high performance E²CMOS semiconductor wafers is a complicated and technically demanding process requiring:

  · a high degree of technical skill;
  · state-of-the-art equipment;
  · the absence of defects in the masks used to print circuits on a wafer;
  · the elimination of minute impurities and errors in each step of the fabrication process; and
  · effective cooperation between the wafer supplier and the circuit designer.

As a result, our foundries may experience difficulties in achieving acceptable quality and yield levels when manufacturing our silicon wafers.

If our assembly and test subcontractors experience quality or yield problems, we may face a shortage of finished products available for sale.

We rely on subcontractors to assemble and test our devices with acceptable quality and yield levels. As is common in our industry, we have experienced quality and yield problems in the past. If we experience prolonged quality or yield problems in the future, our operating results could be harmed.

The majority of our revenue is derived from semiconductor devices assembled in advanced packages. The assembly of advanced packages is a complex process requiring:

  · a high degree of technical skill;
  · state-of-the-art equipment;
  · the absence of defects in lead frames used to attach semiconductor devices to the package;
  · the elimination of raw material impurities and errors in each step of the process; and
  · effective cooperation between the assembly subcontractor and the device manufacturer.

As a result, our subcontractors may experience difficulties in achieving acceptable quality and yield levels when assembling and testing our semiconductor devices.

Deterioration of conditions in Asia may disrupt our existing supply arrangements and result in a shortage of finished products available for sale.

Two of our three silicon wafer suppliers operate fabs located in Asia. Our finished silicon wafers are assembled and tested by independent subcontractors located in Hong Kong, Malaysia, the Philippines, South Korea, Taiwan and Thailand. A prolonged interruption in our supply from any of these subcontractors could harm our operating results.  Economic, financial, social and political conditions in Asia have historically been volatile. Financial difficulties, governmental actions or restrictions, prolonged work stoppages or any other difficulties experienced by our suppliers may disrupt our supply and could harm our operating results.

Our wafer purchases from Seiko Epson are denominated in Japanese yen. The value of the dollar with respect to the yen fluctuates. Substantial deterioration of dollar-yen exchange rates could harm our operating results.

Export sales account for a substantial portion of our revenues and may decline in the future due to economic and governmental uncertainties.

Our export sales are affected by unique risks frequently associated with foreign economies including:

  · changes in local economic conditions;
  · exchange rate volatility;
  · governmental controls and trade restrictions;
  · export license requirements and restrictions on the export of technology;
  · political instability;
  · changes in tax rates, tariffs or freight rates;
  · interruptions in air transportation; and
  · difficulties in staffing and managing foreign sales offices.

For example, our export sales have historically been affected by regional economic crises. Significant changes in the economic climate in the foreign countries where we derive our export sales could harm our operating results.

We may not be able to successfully compete in the highly competitive semiconductor industry.

The semiconductor industry is intensely competitive and many of our direct and indirect competitors have substantially greater financial, technological, manufacturing, marketing and sales resources. If we are unable to compete successfully in this environment, our future results will be adversely affected.

The current level of competition in the programmable logic market is high and may increase as our market expands. We currently compete directly with companies that have licensed our products and technology or have developed similar products. We also compete indirectly with numerous semiconductor companies that offer products and solutions based on alternative technologies. These direct and indirect competitors are established multinational semiconductor companies as well as emerging companies. We also may experience significant competition from foreign companies in the future.

We may fail to retain or attract the specialized technical and management personnel required to successfully operate our business.

To a greater degree than most non-technology companies or larger technology companies, our future success depends on our ability to attract and retain highly qualified technical and management personnel. As a mid-sized company, we are particularly dependent on a relatively small group of key employees. Competition for skilled technical and management employees is intense within our industry. As a result, we may not be able to retain our existing key technical and management personnel. In addition, we may not be able to attract additional qualified employees in the future. If we are unable to retain existing key employees or are unable to hire new qualified employees, our operating results could be adversely affected.

If we are unable to adequately protect our intellectual property rights, our financial results and competitive position may suffer.

Our success depends in part on our proprietary technology. However, we may fail to adequately protect this technology. As a result, we may lose our competitive position or face significant expense to protect or enforce our intellectual property rights.

We intend to continue to protect our proprietary technology through patents, copyrights and trade secrets. Despite this intention, we may not be successful in achieving adequate protection. Claims allowed on any of our patents may not be sufficiently broad to protect our technology. Patents issued to us also may be challenged, invalidated or circumvented. Finally, our competitors may develop similar technology independently.

Companies in the semiconductor industry vigorously pursue their intellectual property rights. If we become involved in protracted intellectual property disputes or litigation we may utilize substantial financial and management resources, which could have an adverse effect on our operating results.

We may also be subject to future intellectual property claims or judgments. If these were to occur, we may not be able to obtain a license on favorable terms or without our operating results being adversely affected.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of June 30, 2001, our principal source of liquidity was $539.3 million of cash and short–term investments, an increase of $3.9 million from the balance of $535.4 million at December 31, 2000. The increase was due primarily to cash generated from operations and exercises of stock options. During the first six months of 2001, we generated approximately $13.3 million of cash and cash equivalents from our operating activities and stock option exercises as compared with $37.9 million during the first six months of 2000.

Accounts receivable at June 30, 2001 decreased by $30.2 million, or 61%, as compared to the balance at December 31, 2000. This decrease was primarily due to decreased billings and revenue levels in comparison to the fourth quarter of 2000. Inventories at June 30, 2001 increased by $8.4 million, or 14%, as compared to the balance at December 31, 2000 primarily due to lower revenue in the first six months of 2001 and continued receipt of wafers started in prior periods. Wafer starts were significantly reduced during the first and second quarters of 2001 in response to lower revenue levels, and inventory decreased by approximately $2.3 million, or three percent during the second quarter of 2001. Management anticipates that inventory levels will continue to decline during the remainder of 2001 in response to reduced wafer starts. Prepaid expenses and other current assets increased by approximately $7.3 million, or 31%, as compared to the balance at December 31, 2000. This increase is due primarily to estimated income taxes paid in the first quarter of 2001 and now considered refundable as a result of the pretax loss recorded in the second quarter of 2001. Current deferred tax assets decreased by approximately $7.6 million, or 15%, as compared to the balance at December 31, 2000. This was primarily due to the decrease in deferred income on sales to distributors (which is recognized currently for income tax purposes), and to a lesser extent the timing of deductions for certain expenses and allowances. The increase in non current deferred income taxes of $8.8 million, or 26%, at June 30, 2001 as compared to December 31, 2000 is due primarily to the net tax effect of intangible asset amortization. Intangible assets, net, decreased by $37.4 million, or 13 percent as compared to the balance at December 31, 2000, primarily due to goodwill and other intangibles amortization, partially offset by new intangible assets acquired during the period which will be amortized over four years. Amortization expense for these assets was not significant in the March 2001 quarter; for the second quarter of 2001 amortization was approximately $0.3 million, including $0.1 million of deferred compensation expense.

Accounts payable and accrued expenses at June 30, 2001 decreased by $41.0 million, or 42%, as compared to the balance at December 31, 2000. This decrease is due primarily to a decrease in wafer purchases as discussed above and contracted assembly activities in response to decreased customer demand and revenue levels.  Deferred income at June 30, 2001 decreased by $24.3 million, or 42%, as compared to the balance at December 31, 2000, due primarily to decreased billings to distributors associated with decreased shipments and lower revenue levels. The $3.6 million, or 38% decrease in income taxes payable at June 30, 2001 as compared to the balance at December 31, 2000 is primarily attributable to the net loss recorded in the second quarter of 2001 and to the timing of tax deductions and payments.

On October 28, 1999, we issued $260 million in 4 3/4% convertible subordinated notes due on November 1, 2006. These notes require that we pay interest semi–annually on May 1 and November 1. Holders of these notes may convert them into shares of our common stock at any time on or before November 1, 2006, at a conversion price of $20.72 per share, subject to adjustment in certain events. Beginning on November 6, 2002 and ending on October 31, 2003, we may redeem the notes in whole or in part at a redemption price of 102.71% of the principal amount. In the subsequent three twelve–month periods, the redemption price declines to 102.04%, 101.36% and 100.68% of principal, respectively. The notes are subordinated in right of payment to all of our senior indebtedness, and are subordinated to all liabilities of our subsidiaries. At June 30, 2001, we had no senior indebtedness and our subsidiaries had $ 3.0 million of other liabilities. Issuance costs relative to the convertible subordinated notes are included in other assets and aggregated approximately $6.9 million and are being amortized to expense over the lives of the notes. Accumulated amortization amounted to approximately $2.9 million at June 30, 2001.

Capital expenditures were approximately $8 million in the first six months of 2001. We expect to spend approximately $15 million to $20 million for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2001.

We own approximately 84 million shares of UMC common stock at a carrying amount of approximately $137.7 million at June 30, 2001. This balance reflects net unrealized losses of $80.1 million ($49.3 million after-tax) through that date on the unrestricted portion of these shares (see Notes 5 and 8). In conjunction with the acquisition of these shares, we received the right to purchase a certain percentage of UMC’s wafer production. We will retain these rights as long as we retain a certain percentage of these shares. Also, due to regulatory restrictions, approximately one-third of our shares may not be sold until after January 2002, with the regulatory restrictions expiring between January 2002 and January 2004.

In June 1999, as part of our acquisition of Vantis, we entered into a series of agreements with AMD to support the continuing operations of Vantis. AMD has agreed to provide us with finished silicon wafers through September 2003 in quantities based either on a rolling six-month or an annual forecast.  We have committed to buy certain minimum quantities of wafers and AMD has committed to supply certain quantities of wafers during this period.  Wafers for our products are manufactured in the United States at multiple AMD wafer fabrication facilities.  Prices for these wafers will be reviewed and adjusted periodically.

We believe that our existing liquid resources and expected cash generated from operations combined with our ability to borrow additional funds will be adequate to meet our operating and capital requirements and obligations for the next 12 months.

In an effort to secure additional wafer supply, we may from time to time consider various financial arrangements including joint ventures, equity investments, advance purchase payments, loans, or similar arrangements with independent wafer manufacturers in exchange for committed wafer capacity. To the extent that we pursue any such additional financing arrangements, additional debt or equity financing may be required. We may in the future seek new or additional sources of funding. There can be no assurance that such additional financing will be available when needed or, if available, will be on favorable terms. Any future equity financing will decrease existing stockholders' equity percentage ownership and may, depending on the price at which the equity is sold, result in dilution.

Item 7. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

As of June 30, 2001 and December 31, 2000 our investment portfolio consisted of fixed income securities of $ 523.9 million and $507.3 million, respectively. As with all fixed income instruments, these securities are subject to interest rate risk and will decline in value if market interest rates increase. If market rates were to increase immediately and uniformly by 10% from levels as of June 30, 2001 and December 31, 2000, the decline in the fair value of the portfolio would not be material. Further, we have the ability to hold our fixed income investments until maturity and, therefore, we would not expect to recognize such an adverse impact on our income or cash flows.

We have international subsidiary and branch operations. Additionally, a portion of our silicon wafer purchases are denominated in Japanese yen. We therefore are subject to foreign currency rate exposure. To mitigate rate exposure with respect to yen-denominated wafer purchases, we maintain yen-denominated bank accounts and bill our Japanese customers in yen. The yen bank deposits are utilized to hedge yen-denominated specific and firm wafer purchases. If the foreign currency rates fluctuate by 10% from rates at June 30, 2001 and December 31, 2000, the effect on our consolidated financial statements would not be material. However, there can be no assurance that there will not be a material impact in the future.

We are exposed to equity price risk and foreign currency rate exposure due to our equity investment in UMC (see Note 8). These shares are traded on the Taiwanese stock exchange and are valued in New Taiwanese Dollars. Neither a 10% change in equity price related to this investment nor a 10% fluctuation in exchange rates would have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements. However, there can be no assurance that there will not be a material impact in the future.

PART II.   OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 4.   SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

  (a) The annual meeting of stockholders was held on May 1, 2001.      
  (b) The following directors were elected at the meeting to serve      
a term of three years:      
  Mark O. Hatfield      
  Cyrus Y. Tsui      
         
  The following directors are continuing to serve their terms:      
         
  Daniel S. Hauer      
  Soo Boon Koh      
  Harry A. Merlo      
  Larry W. Sonsini      
         
  (c) The matters voted upon at the meeting and results of the      
voting with respect to those matters are as follows:      
         
  For   Withheld  
 
 
 
         
(1) Election of director:    
  Mark O. Hatfield 97,176,425   11,310,382
  Cyrus Y. Tsui 86,642,192   21,844,615

 

  For   Against   Abstain   Not Voted
 
 
 
 
(2) Approval of the              
2001 Outside Directors’              
Stock Option Plan 62,218,191   23,950,627   176,165   22,141,824
               
(3) Approval of the              
2001 Stock Plan 49,499,095   36,664,123   181,765   22,141,824
               
(4) Ratification of              
PricewaterhouseCoopers              
LLP as the Company's              
independent public              
accountant for the              
fiscal year ending              
December 31, 2001 97,095,729   581,726   17,161   10,792,191

The foregoing matters are described in further detail in our definitive proxy statement dated March 29, 2001 for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May 1, 2001.

ITEM 6.            Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

(a) Exhibits
  None
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
  No reports on Form 8-K were filed during the second quarter of 2001.

 

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION (Registrant)

Date: August 9, 2001

 

 

By: /s/ Stephen A. Skaggs

 
  Stephen A. Skaggs  
  Senior Vice President Finance, Chief Financial Officer
and Secretary