SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP
525 UNIVERSITY AVENUE
PALO ALTO, CALIFORNIA 94301
TEL: (650) 470-4500 FAX: (650) 470-4570 www.skadden.com |
FIRM/AFFILIATE OFFICES | |||
BOSTON | ||||
CHICAGO | ||||
HOUSTON | ||||
LOS ANGELES | ||||
NEW YORK | ||||
WASHINGTON, D.C. | ||||
WILMINGTON | ||||
BEIJING BRUSSELS FRANKFURT HONG KONG LONDON MOSCOW MUNICH PARIS SÃO PAULO SHANGHAI SINGAPORE SYDNEY TOKYO TORONTO VIENNA | ||||
January 20, 2017 | ||||
VIA EDGAR | ||||
Heather Percival, Senior Attorney Office of Electronics and Machinery Division of Corporation Finance |
||||
United States Securities and Exchange Commission | ||||
100 F Street, N.E. | ||||
Washington, D.C. 20549 |
Re: | Lattice Semiconductor Corporation |
Amendment No. 1 to Preliminary Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A |
(the Amended Preliminary Proxy Statement) |
Filed December 28, 2016 |
File No. 000-18032 |
Dear Ms. Percival:
Set forth below are the responses of Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (the Company, we or us) to the comments of the staff (the Staff) of the Division of Corporation Finance of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission received by letter, dated January 9, 2017, concerning the Amended Preliminary Proxy Statement and the merger contemplated therein. For your convenience, each response of ours immediately follows the text of the corresponding comment of the Staff. The Staffs comments have been indicated in bold italics. In addition to the responses below, we have filed today a revised version of the Amended Preliminary Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A (the Revised Proxy Statement) to address the Staffs comments and update certain additional information. For the convenience of the Staff, we are delivering paper copies of this letter and copies of the Revised Proxy Statement marked to show changes from the Amended Preliminary Proxy Statement. All references in this letter to page numbers and captions correspond to the page numbers and captions in the Revised Proxy Statement, unless otherwise noted.
Ms. Heather Percival
January 20, 2017
Page 2 of 2
Financing of the Merger, page 84
1. | Your revisions added in response to prior comment 1 imply that CVC, the large Chinese investment fund, is the source of funds for the transaction. If that is correct, please revise for clarity. If that is not correct, please revise to clarify the source of funds. |
In response to the Staffs comment, we have complied and revised our disclosure on page 84 of the Revised Proxy Statement under the heading Financing of the Merger to clarify the source of the funds for the proposed transaction.
Regulatory Approvals Required for the Merger, page 93
2. | Please expand your revisions in response to prior comment 2 to clarify why CFIUS may prevent or limit approval of the transaction. For example, we note your added disclosure regarding CFIUS determining the presence or absence of national security concerns. However, it is unclear from your disclosure why national security concerns are or are not present. |
In response to the Staffs comment, we have complied and revised the disclosure on page 93 of the Revised Proxy Statement under the heading Regulatory Approvals Required for the Merger to explain how potential national security concerns may relate to the proposed transaction.
***
Please contact the undersigned at (650) 470-4522 should you require further information.
Very truly yours, |
/s/ Thomas J. Ivey |
Thomas J. Ivey, Esq. |
cc: | Securities and Exchange Commission |
Geoff Kruczek |
Amanda Ravitz |
cc: | Lattice Semiconductor Corporation |
Darin G. Billerberck |
Byron W. Milstead |